<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://askyourlawmaker.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Latest Answers</title>
 <link>http://askyourlawmaker.org/answers/latest/%2A/434/%2A/%2A</link>
 <description>a view of answers sorted by date</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The two party system is a bi-product of the system we have right now, the fact that we have single member districts where one person is elected will always result in a two party system, it does in other countries as well. The constitution was designed with no parties in mind and can function with one, or two or multi or no parties whatsoever, as long as you have separation of powers and federalism securely in place. We are mucking around with federalism and separation of powers to the point that it doesn’t help. But whether there are two parties or multiple parties is really insignificant and it is a bi-product of the system we have created by statute of a single representative elected from a district. If you change that you’ll change the number of parties, whether that is more helpful or not is probably insignificant.</title>
 <link>http://askyourlawmaker.org/answers/two-party-system-bi-product-system-we-have-right-now%2C-fact-we-have-single-member-districts-w</link>
 <description></description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 11:49:42 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>amukherjee</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1324 at http://askyourlawmaker.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
